“Nearly 190 million people, about 3% percent of the world’s population, lived outside their country of birth in 2005.” says the mighty NY Times.
I’ve been thinking about how this “migration” problem isn’t just a Filipino thing. Duh, Val. But really, what I was thinking about is how Filipinos aren’t alone in the problems they face in and during migration.
Yup, just like any good sociologist would do. I’ve been trying to categorize different themes that where migration becomes a contradiction. Well, migration under a neoliberal political and economic climate, to be specific.
I mean how many states are wishing to be better labor brokering institutions, how many governments are aspiring to be good wells of indispensable and disposable labor, and more importantly, how many people in the 3rd world are looking to get out via migration, how many families are getting shafted because of it, how are countries sustaining the absence of its citizens.
Here are some themes I’ve come up with:
WANTING TO STAY HOME, NEEDING TO GO
Malaysian people sound a lot like women in my research who desire to stay home but realistically cannot.
SURVEILLANCE AND THE DISCIPLINE OF MIGRANT BODIES
One thing I thought that was super helpful when I read Foucault was when he wrote about the disciplined subject and the surveillance of population. Sure looks like that in China.
MIGRANTS AS CULPRITS
http://www.altoarizona.com says it all.
There’s more but they’re hiding in my brain.
Lesson of the day, pals: Migrants of the world have, now more than ever, many things that they are experiencing together, albeit apart. We, immigrants and migrants, have to stand together.
Here’s a good way to do that: IAMR3. Peep.
Leave a Reply